Comparisons

March 15, 2025

AdBacklog vs. Spreadsheets, Notion/ClickUp & Ad Managers: The All-in-One Advantage

Introduction


Digital marketers often juggle fragmented workflows spread across spreadsheets, generic project tools, and individual ad platform dashboards. It’s common to use Excel or Google Sheets for tracking, Notion/ClickUp for notes and task management, plus separate interfaces like Meta Ads Manager or Google Ads to run campaigns. This patchwork approach causes disconnected information – data in one place, tasks in another, and conversations in yet another – leading to wasted time, miscommunication, and missed deadlines. AdBacklog eliminates this chaos by providing an all-in-one campaign management workspace that replaces jumping between Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, GA4, Slack, Notion, emails, and spreadsheets. In one platform, marketers can plan, track, and optimize campaigns from idea to insight across teams and channels. Below, we compare AdBacklog to Excel/Spreadsheets, Notion/ClickUp, and native ad manager tools, highlighting how AdBacklog’s unified features outperform these alternatives in campaign management, collaboration, creative asset handling, and communication.


Comprehensive Campaign Management (Planning & Tracking)


AdBacklog serves as a centralized command center for campaigns, offering flexible, multi-view planning tools that traditional spreadsheets and siloed ad platforms can’t match. Marketers can visualize and manage campaigns in a Table view, Kanban board, Calendar, or Timeline format to suit their workflow. This multi-view capability means you can see your entire campaign pipeline – from scheduled launch dates on a calendar to task progress on a kanban board – all within one system. AdBacklog also supports filtering and tagging by funnel stage, campaign type, channel, owner, or status to quickly organize and find campaigns. By contrast, Excel is limited to rows and columns; making a timeline or kanban in a spreadsheet is cumbersome and entirely manual. Planning in Excel often leads to messy sheets and broken formulas over time, with no interactive calendar or board to visualize status. Notion/ClickUp, as general project management tools, offer some views (e.g. Notion databases can be viewed as a calendar or board), but these are not specialized for marketing campaigns – you’d have to manually enter dates, status, and performance data, and there’s no native cross-channel awareness. Meanwhile, native ad manager platforms (Meta, LinkedIn, Google, etc.) each provide their own interface for campaigns, but only in a siloed way. You might get a list or basic calendar of scheduled ads in one platform, but there’s no unified view across channels. AdBacklog’s advantage is giving a single birds-eye view of all campaigns across all platforms, with timelines and status indicators, so you always know what’s live, what’s in progress, and what’s coming next without having to click into multiple tools. This comprehensive campaign management in AdBacklog means less time spent piecing together updates and more time actively optimizing strategies.


Collaboration & Communication


Collaboration is far more seamless in AdBacklog’s all-in-one environment compared to the patchwork of spreadsheets, emails, and chat threads most teams rely on. AdBacklog includes built-in collaboration tools with role-based user permissions, allowing you to invite teammates, clients, or stakeholders into the platform with appropriate access levels (e.g. view-only client access vs. editor rights for team members). Everyone works off the same shared workspace, so context never gets lost – discussions, tasks, assets, and performance data all live together. Team members can assign responsibilities, update statuses, and share feedback in real time, knowing that colleagues and clients will immediately see the changes. AdBacklog effectively replaces long Slack threads and scattered email updates by centralizing campaign communications. In fact, marketers report that after AdBacklog, they no longer juggle separate spreadsheets and Slack chats – “everything lives in AdBacklog” and they can instantly track who’s doing what and where things stand.


By comparison, Excel or Google Sheets offer only basic collaboration (multiple people can edit a sheet, or you might use comments) but lack true workflow features – there’s no easy way to assign tasks or notify a colleague within a spreadsheet. Important context often ends up buried in email chains about the spreadsheet, or in separate documents. Notion/ClickUp do support team collaboration better (with commenting, @ mentions, task assignments, etc.), but when used for campaign management they still require marketers to reference external data. For example, a team might write campaign briefs in Notion and track tasks in ClickUp, but still have to paste in performance numbers from Google Ads or discuss results in Slack. This means hopping between tools and potential miscommunication when updates aren’t synchronized. Ad manager platforms (Meta Ads Manager, Google Ads, etc.) allow multiple users to work on campaigns, but they are not collaboration hubs in the project-management sense – there’s no concept of task assignments or team-wide dashboards across all campaigns. Often teams using ad managers must resort to separate project trackers and meetings to coordinate (“Did we launch that Facebook campaign? Where are the Google Ads results?”). AdBacklog eliminates these coordination headaches by providing real-time status tracking and notifications in one place. Everyone from the marketing team to the client can see up-to-date campaign status and performance at a glance, which keeps the entire team aligned and informed. Furthermore, AdBacklog’s shareable dashboards and progress views allow marketers to communicate updates to clients or executives effortlessly – instead of emailing slide decks or spreadsheets each week, you can simply share a live dashboard link with controlled access. This all-in-one collaboration means fewer meetings and status check emails, because stakeholders can self-serve the latest info anytime.


Creative Asset Handling


Handling creative assets (ad images, videos, copy, etc.) becomes much more efficient and organized with AdBacklog. In AdBacklog, campaign tasks and creative assets live side by side – you can store and manage all your ad creatives alongside the campaign or experiment they belong to. This central repository ensures that everyone is using the correct versions of images and ad copy, and you can easily refer back to what asset was used in which campaign. AdBacklog even makes it easy to log different creative variations and track their performance, bringing clarity to which creatives worked best across your online ads. In practice, this might mean an agency can upload all banner designs for a campaign into AdBacklog, tag them, associate them with the campaign task, and later see results – all without digging through emails or separate file drives.


Using Excel or Sheets for asset management is nearly impossible (at best you’d paste a link to a file or image, with no preview or version control). Teams relying on spreadsheets often end up with assets scattered in shared drives or buried in email attachments – a recipe for lost files and confusion. Notion/ClickUp do allow file attachments or embedding images in docs, so some marketers try to use them as makeshift asset hubs. However, these tools don’t connect those assets to live ad performance. You might have a Notion page with images and copy, but once the campaign runs on Facebook, the results and the creative aren’t linked in Notion. It’s still on the marketer to manually note which creative did what. Ad managers themselves (e.g. Facebook’s Creative Library or Google Ads asset library) only store creatives used on that platform, and they lack project context. You can’t attach a brief or approval notes to an image in Google Ads; you also can’t see, say, a Google display ad image and a Facebook ad video side by side in one view – because each platform’s assets are siloed. AdBacklog’s centralized asset management cuts through these limitations by keeping all creative assets and their campaign context in one system. When a team member looks at a campaign entry in AdBacklog, they can find the approved ad copy, the final images/videos, and see any comments or approvals associated with them. Later, they can review how each creative performed through AdBacklog’s integrated reports. This not only prevents the “where’s the file?” scramble, but also streamlines creative feedback loops. In short, AdBacklog treats creative assets as first-class elements of the campaign process, unlike the fragmented approach of other tools.


Performance Tracking & Automated Reporting


Perhaps one of AdBacklog’s strongest advantages is its cross-channel performance tracking and automated reporting. Instead of checking multiple analytics dashboards, AdBacklog users can monitor campaign performance across Meta (Facebook), Google, LinkedIn, and more from a single dashboard. The platform pulls in key metrics from different ad channels and presents them in a unified, structured format, saving marketers from the tedious work of logging into each ad manager or copying data into spreadsheets. With AdBacklog, you get real-time insights on what’s working across all channels – “no more guessing what’s working” because the data is collected for you and clearly displayed. The reporting is not just raw data dumps, either. AdBacklog provides visualizations and trend charts (e.g. a consolidated timeline of campaign results) and can generate reports that update automatically. This means weekly or monthly reporting to stakeholders can be done at the push of a button, rather than laboriously exporting CSVs and building pivot tables. AdBacklog also lets you slice and dice performance by tags like funnel stage or campaign type, since you can tag each campaign entry and then filter or compare results by those categories (for example, comparing Lead Generation campaigns vs. Awareness campaigns across all platforms).


In contrast, a spreadsheet-based approach to reporting is entirely manual – someone has to export data from Google Ads, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc., then merge it into Excel sheets, update formulas or charts, and ensure no mistakes were made in the process. Not only is this time-consuming, but it also means reports are outdated the moment something changes or a new campaign launches (unless you constantly refresh them). Notion/ClickUp have no built-in capability for pulling ad performance data; at best, a team might embed charts from another tool or write summary notes, but the process behind those is still manual or requires a separate BI integration. Each update requires additional effort, which often leads to reports that are infrequent or not detailed. Native ad managers do offer robust reporting for their own platform (e.g. Google Ads has its Reports section, Facebook has Ad Reports), and some analytics tools (like GA4 or Looker Studio) can combine data, but marketers must still hop between these tools to gather a complete picture. One platform won’t tell you how your overall marketing budget across all channels is doing; that insight has to be assembled externally. AdBacklog’s all-in-one reporting cuts out that fragmented step. It automatically aggregates cross-channel metrics so you can see overall ROI and KPIs in one place. Moreover, because AdBacklog ties in with the planning side, you can easily correlate outcomes with campaign details – for example, linking a spike in performance to the specific creative or experiment logged in AdBacklog. The result is not only time saved, but better decision-making: teams can get automated performance alerts and insights without guesswork, and respond faster to optimize campaigns. In sum, AdBacklog turns what used to be a tedious, error-prone reporting workflow into a streamlined, insightful dashboard that keeps everyone data-informed.


Scalability and Unified Workflow Efficiency


AdBacklog is designed to scale with your needs, providing value whether you’re an individual marketer or part of a large agency. A single user or freelancer can use AdBacklog as a lightweight, structured system for all their campaigns, while teams and agencies can onboard their whole department or client base into it without missing a beat. The platform supports granular user management (so as your team grows, you can add members with appropriate permissions) and even client-specific workspaces and dashboards for agencies managing multiple clients. This scalability contrasts with the alternative tools, which often break down as scope increases. For example, a lone marketer might get by with a spreadsheet, but if that sheet grows to dozens of campaigns and you add multiple collaborators, it can quickly become unmanageable – version control issues, slow loading, and confusion over which cell means what. Notion or ClickUp can handle team collaboration better, but they are still generic tools; as the number of campaigns and clients increases, you essentially have to reinvent the organizational structure and manually integrate more data sources, which doesn’t scale cleanly. Similarly, relying on individual ad managers becomes more problematic at scale: an agency running campaigns on three platforms for 10 clients ends up managing 30 separate dashboards, which is incredibly inefficient. AdBacklog, on the other hand, centralizes all campaigns regardless of platform or client in one ecosystem, so adding more campaigns or users doesn’t create chaos – it simply means adding another entry to the well-organized backlog. The all-in-one workflow also yields compounding efficiency: teams aren’t constantly switching contexts or copying data between tools. By eliminating the friction between planning, execution, and reporting, AdBacklog lets organizations operate faster and with greater clarity. It “reduces the noise, eliminates confusion, and replaces scattered tools with one streamlined solution” as the product’s creators put it. The bottom line is that AdBacklog scales up without forcing you to adopt a slew of new tools or processes – it’s a single source of truth that grows with your marketing operation, from a small startup’s campaigns to an agency’s multi-channel portfolios.


Comparison Table: AdBacklog vs. Alternatives


The following table summarizes how AdBacklog stacks up against using Spreadsheets (Excel/Google Sheets), Notion/ClickUp, and Individual Ad Platform Managers on key campaign management features:

Key Features & Capabilities

AdBacklog (All-in-One)

Spreadsheets (Excel/Sheets)

Notion/ClickUp (Project Tools)

Native Ad Managers (Meta, Google, etc.)

Multi-View Campaign Planning – View campaigns as table, Kanban board, calendar, Gantt/timeline.

Yes: Built-in table, calendar, kanban, timeline views for campaigns. Flexible visualization of schedules and workflow.

No: Limited to grid layouts. No calendar or kanban without manual workaround.

Partial: Offers list/board/calendar views, but not specialized for ad campaigns (requires manual setup and data input).

No: Each platform has a fixed interface (list or limited calendar) for its own campaigns only.

Cross-Channel Tracking & Unified Dashboard – Track performance across Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. in one place.

Yes: Integrates data from multiple ad channels into one dashboard; no need to jump between separate platforms. Full visibility across all campaigns.

No: Must manually consolidate data from each channel. No native integrations; prone to broken formulas and outdated data.

No: No built-in integration for ad metrics; would rely on external embeds or manual updates for each platform’s data.

No: Siloed to one channel’s data. Marketers must log into each ad manager separately; no consolidated cross-platform view.

Centralized Task & Creative Asset Management – Manage to-dos and store ad creatives together.

Yes: Tasks, ideas, and creative assets are stored together in a central campaign workspace. Easy to track versions and approvals in context.

No: Can list tasks, but cannot attach or manage images/videos in-line. Assets live in separate files or drives.

Partial: Supports task lists and file attachments, but not tied to live ad campaigns; assets not linked to performance results.

No: Lacks project/task management; creatives are stored per platform with no overarching project context.

Collaboration & User Permissions – Multi-user collaboration with roles (e.g. team vs client access).

Yes: Real-time collaboration with comments and notifications. Role-based permissions (viewer, editor, admin) for team members and clients. Everyone sees the latest status simultaneously.

Limited: Basic sharing (edit or view rights on a sheet). No advanced roles or marketing-specific collaboration features.

Partial: Good internal collaboration (comments, mentions, etc.), but not purpose-built for marketing roles; external stakeholder access is clunky.

Limited: Allows multiple user logins, but no granular roles per campaign. Collaboration typically handled outside the platform (via email/Slack).

Real-Time Status Tracking & Progress Visualization – See campaign status, stages, and progress at a glance.

Yes: Live status indicators and progress views (e.g. kanban “In Progress/Launched” columns, timeline of upcoming campaigns). Always know what’s live, what’s next.

No: Static data only. Progress must be updated manually (often lagging behind) and there’s no visual workflow view.

Partial: Task statuses can be updated, but tying those to actual ad launch status or results requires manual input. No automatic visualization of marketing funnel stages.

Basic: Shows if an ad/campaign is active or paused, but no broader project status view. No combined timeline across multiple campaigns.

Automated Performance Reporting & Insights – Auto-generate reports, visualize results, get recommendations.

Yes: Built-in analytics with charts and trend visuals for each campaign and across campaigns. Reports update automatically with latest data; no manual number-crunching. AdBacklog provides insights across funnel stages and channels.

No: Reporting is manual (copy-paste data, create charts). No automation; high risk of errors or stale data.

No: No native reporting on ad performance. Would need third-party BI tools or manual compilation for marketing metrics.

Yes (single-platform): Each ad manager provides reporting for its own ads, but no automatic cross-platform reporting (marketer must aggregate results externally).

Funnel Stage, Campaign Type & Platform Tagging – Categorize and filter campaigns by custom tags.

Yes: Supports tagging campaigns by funnel stage (awareness, consideration, etc.), campaign objective/type, and platform, enabling easy filtering and segmented analysis.

No: Only possible via ad-hoc columns; no enforced consistency or easy filtering (requires manual spreadsheet filtering).

Partial: Users can add tags or properties in Notion/ClickUp, but it’s manual and not linked to any marketing analytics.

Partial: Some platform-specific categorization (e.g. campaign objectives in Facebook, or labels in Google Ads), but tags don’t carry across platforms. No unified tagging schema across all channels.

Shareable Dashboards for Clients/Stakeholders – Easy external sharing of live campaign status or results.

Yes: Share read-only dashboards or live reports with clients and management in a click. Clients can view their campaign pipeline and performance in real time without editing rights.

No: Must export or email spreadsheets/presentations for updates. No live dashboard capability.

Limited: Can share pages or reports manually, but not interactive real-time dashboards tied to actual ad data. Often requires constantly updating a client-facing doc.

Limited: Can give a client access to a platform’s account or send platform-specific report links, but they’d have to check each platform separately (no single client view across all marketing efforts).

Scalability for Any Team Size – Usable by individual marketers up to large agencies.

Yes: Scales from single users to enterprise. Designed for freelancers, in-house teams, and agencies alike with tiered features (e.g. client workspaces, multiple teams). Adding more campaigns or users remains organized and efficient.

Limited: Works for one person or small teams on a simple project, but large-scale use becomes unwieldy (difficult to maintain as campaigns multiply).

Moderate: Can support team workflows, but large-scale marketing operations require heavy customization and still lack integrated data – not purpose-built for multi-client campaign management.

Limited: Effective for handling volume on that one platform (you can run many ads), but managing growth across platforms means multiplying tools. No inherent support for multi-client across all channels together.


Conclusion


When comparing AdBacklog to spreadsheets, general project tools, and native ad managers, the difference is clear: AdBacklog consolidates what others scatter across many tools. It provides a single source of truth for campaign planning, teamwork, asset management, and performance tracking. The result is a dramatically more efficient and transparent workflow – marketers spend less time updating spreadsheets or switching tabs, and more time driving results. AdBacklog’s all-in-one capabilities bring structure, real-time visibility, and ease of sharing that fragmented solutions simply cannot match. In short, AdBacklog is the superior solution for campaign management, offering clarity over clutter and unified collaboration that helps marketing teams deliver their best work. It turns the formerly fragmented process into a streamlined powerhouse, enabling you to plan better, collaborate easier, and optimize faster – all in one place.